Changes
/* '''A Comparison of LCD and OLED technologies''' */
==='''A Comparison of LCD and OLED technologies'''===
The ''radar graph'' here shows the comparison between OLED and TFT LCD.
# OLEDs are ''thinner'' than LCDs.
# OLEDs are ''lighter'' in weight.
# OLEDs consume ''more power'' than LCDs: Power Consumption is a measure of the amount of power required by a display to produce a certain level of brightness. In theory, but OLEDs have an inherent advantage in that they only consume power when they emit light. For example, a black OLED pixel consumes no power. An while an LCD backlight consumes constant power regardless of the image being displayed. However, LCDs still hold a slight advantage over the OLEDs currently in production. Future generations of OLED displays will be far more efficient than their LCD counterparts.# OLEDs ''cost more'': The Cost of an AM-LCD is currently about half that of a comparable AM-OLED display. This is again due to the maturity of the LCD manufacturing processes and facilities. The components comprising a typical LCD display are actually more expensive than those in an OLED display. However, OLED manufacturing facilities suffer from low yields, currently at 60%-70%. The higher cost and low output of OLED panels due to faulty yield closes off large portions of the potential market to panel makers. Also contributing to the cost is simply the inability of manufacturers to deliver enough units to satisfy large orders.
# OLEDs have a ''shorter lifespan'' as compared to LCDs.
# OLEDs have a ''faster response time''. They have a response time of .01ms while LCDs have a response time about 8-12ms.
# OLEDs have a ''superior viewing angle'' of 180 degree while LCDs have a lower viewing angle.
