Difference between revisions of "SAP Software Patents Sample(6 months before and after October 2008)"

From DolceraWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Rejections)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=Rejections=
 
=Rejections=
 +
{|border="2" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" width="100%"
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''S.No.'''</font>
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''Publication <nowiki> </nowiki>'''</font>
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''Date of Publication'''</font>
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''Application Date'''</font>
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''Date of Rejection'''</font>
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''Rejection type'''</font>
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''101 Rejection'''</font>
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''102 Rejection'''</font>
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''103 Rejection'''</font>
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''112 Rejection'''</font>
 +
|-
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''1'''</font>
 +
|bgcolor = "#CCFFFF"|US20080243564A1
 +
|align = "right"|10/2/2008
 +
|align = "right"|3/30/2007
 +
|3/6/2009
 +
|101, 102 and 103 rejections
 +
|Claims 1-11 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter.
 +
|Claims 1, 3-12, and 14-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Sladky et al. (US 2006/0173617).
 +
|Claims 2 and 13 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sladky et al. in view of Examiner<nowiki>’</nowiki>s Official Notice.
 +
|N/A
 +
|-
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''2'''</font>
 +
|align = "center"|US20080183671A1
 +
|align = "right"|7/31/2008
 +
|align = "right"|1/26/2007
 +
|12/29/2008
 +
|101 and 102 rejections
 +
|Claims 17-1 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter.
 +
|Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Bangel et al. (US 200610167847).
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''3'''</font>
 +
|US20080154854A1
 +
|align = "right"|6/26/2008
 +
|align = "right"|12/22/2006
 +
|12/31/2008
 +
|101, 102 and 103 rejections
 +
|Claims 10-1 9 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter.
 +
|Claims 1-3, 5, 8, 10-1 2, 14, 17 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Grimes et al (U.S. Patent Application 200510144895 A1 hereinafter, "Grimes").
 +
|Claims 4, 6-7, 20, 12, 15-1 6 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being obvious by Grimes et al as applied to claims 1-3, 5, 8, 10-1 2, 14, 17 and 19, and in view of Friend et al (U.S. Patent Application 2006101 07224 A1 hereinafter, "Friend").
 +
|N/A
 +
|-
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''4'''</font>
 +
|US20080154948A1
 +
|align = "right"|6/26/2008
 +
|align = "right"|12/22/2006
 +
|10/9/2008
 +
|101 and 102 rejections
 +
|Claims 11 -21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter.
 +
|Claims 1-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Spence et al. (Patent No. 6,591,277 B2 filed December 27, 2000, hereinafter Spence).
 +
|N/A
 +
|N/A
 +
|-
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''5'''</font>
 +
|align = "center"|US20080123634A1
 +
|align = "right"|5/29/2008
 +
|align = "right"|1/22/2008
 +
|5/30/2008
 +
|103 rejection
 +
|N/A
 +
|N/A
 +
|1. Claims 1-8, 10, and 1 1 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Eric Dowling et a1 (US 7,277,424) in view of Schoo et a1 (US 6,304,574)                                                                                  2. Claims 15 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Eric Dowling et a1 (US 7,277,424) in view of LaPier et a1 (US 6,333,93 1) as applied to Claim 12 and further in view of Humpleman et a1 (US 6,466,971).
 +
|N/A
 +
|-
 +
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''6'''</font>
 +
|align = "center"|US20080086490A1
 +
|align = "right"|4/10/2008
 +
|align = "right"|10/4/2006
 +
|10/28/2008
 +
|101 rejection
 +
|Claims 1-1 3 & 27 are rejected under 35 USC 101 as being directed to software per se. Claim 1 & 27 recites a "system".
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
 
=Examination Information Not Available=
 
=Examination Information Not Available=

Revision as of 04:45, 18 April 2009

Rejections

S.No. Publication Date of Publication Application Date Date of Rejection Rejection type 101 Rejection 102 Rejection 103 Rejection 112 Rejection
1 US20080243564A1 10/2/2008 3/30/2007 3/6/2009 101, 102 and 103 rejections Claims 1-11 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claims 1, 3-12, and 14-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Sladky et al. (US 2006/0173617). Claims 2 and 13 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sladky et al. in view of Examiners Official Notice. N/A
2 US20080183671A1 7/31/2008 1/26/2007 12/29/2008 101 and 102 rejections Claims 17-1 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Bangel et al. (US 200610167847).
3 US20080154854A1 6/26/2008 12/22/2006 12/31/2008 101, 102 and 103 rejections Claims 10-1 9 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claims 1-3, 5, 8, 10-1 2, 14, 17 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Grimes et al (U.S. Patent Application 200510144895 A1 hereinafter, "Grimes"). Claims 4, 6-7, 20, 12, 15-1 6 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being obvious by Grimes et al as applied to claims 1-3, 5, 8, 10-1 2, 14, 17 and 19, and in view of Friend et al (U.S. Patent Application 2006101 07224 A1 hereinafter, "Friend"). N/A
4 US20080154948A1 6/26/2008 12/22/2006 10/9/2008 101 and 102 rejections Claims 11 -21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claims 1-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Spence et al. (Patent No. 6,591,277 B2 filed December 27, 2000, hereinafter Spence). N/A N/A
5 US20080123634A1 5/29/2008 1/22/2008 5/30/2008 103 rejection N/A N/A 1. Claims 1-8, 10, and 1 1 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Eric Dowling et a1 (US 7,277,424) in view of Schoo et a1 (US 6,304,574) 2. Claims 15 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Eric Dowling et a1 (US 7,277,424) in view of LaPier et a1 (US 6,333,93 1) as applied to Claim 12 and further in view of Humpleman et a1 (US 6,466,971). N/A
6 US20080086490A1 4/10/2008 10/4/2006 10/28/2008 101 rejection Claims 1-1 3 & 27 are rejected under 35 USC 101 as being directed to software per se. Claim 1 & 27 recites a "system".

Examination Information Not Available