Difference between revisions of "Bilski 35 USC § 101 Rejections Patent Application List"

From DolceraWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Bilski Medtech Sample)
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
== '''Bilski Medtech Sample''' ==
+
* [[Bilski Medtech Sample]]
−
{|border="2" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" width="100%"
+
* [[Bilski Pharma Sample]]
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''S.No'''</font>
+
* [[Bilski Diagnostic Sample]]
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''Publication No.'''</font>
+
* [[SAP Software Patents Sample]]
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''Rejection type'''</font>
+
* [[Bilski Diagnostic Methods Big Sample Sheet]]
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''101 Rejection'''</font>
+
* [[SAP Software Patents Sample(6 months before and after October 2008)]]
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''102 Rejection'''</font>
+
* [[Software Patents Sample(6 months before and after October 2008)]]
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''103 Rejection'''</font>
+
* [[101 rejections of Software Patents(Date of Rejections After October-30-2008)]]
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''112 Rejection'''</font>
+
* [[101 rejections of Diagnostic Patents(Date of Rejections After October-30-2008)]]
−
|-
+
* [[Media:Bilski 1.xls|Bilski]]
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''1'''</font>
+
* [[Media:Statistical information of Bilski citations.xls|Statistical information of Bilski]]
−
|align = "center"|US20060190302A1
+
−
|103 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 19-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Chaco et al., U.S. Patent 5,822,544 in view of Lichtman et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,819,107.
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''2'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060189976A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''3'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060195058A1
+
−
|102 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1-26 and 41-54 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as obvious over Goldberger et al. (US Patent Application Publication US 200610079809).
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''4'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060195159A1
+
−
|102 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1-3, 5, 8-1 3, 16-1 8, & 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Bradley (US 200301 39781).
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''5'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060194724A1
+
−
|103 and 112 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|The rejection of claims 1-1 6, 44-47, 49, 50-62, 64-70 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Shafik (Andrologia. 1996. 28: 151 -6) or Heiduschka et al. (Exp. Neurol. 2001. 171 : 1-10) in view of Burnett (World J. Urol, 2003.20: 337-342), US 6208894 (issued Mar 27,2001) and US 6464687 (issued Oct 15, 2002) is withdrawn in response to Applicant<nowiki>’</nowiki>s amendment to the claims and cancellation of claims 2, 7, 46, 52-70.
+
−
|The rejection of claims 2, 7,46, 52-70 under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph,<br>because the specification does not enable the invention commensurate in scope with<br>the claims is moot because the claims are canceled.
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''6'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060195144A1
+
−
|102 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1-12 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by<br>DiLorenzo (US 6,366,813).
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''7'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060200025A1
+
−
|102 and 103 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1-21, 29-42, 43, and 45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Foley et al (US Pat: 6,167,145).
+
−
|Claims 22-28 and 44 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Foley et al (US Pat: 6,167,145) stand alone.
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''8'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060200034A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''9'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060200205A1
+
−
|102 and 103 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1, 3, 5-9, 11-14, 16, and 18-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Cohen.
+
−
|Claims 1, 3, 6-9, 11, 12, 14, 16, and 18-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Boveja, previously cited, in view of Tanagho, herein Boveja in view of Tanagho
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''10'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060200011A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''11'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060200036A1
+
−
|112, 102 and 103 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1-2,25-26,35-37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by "Detection of Atrial Persistent Rhythm Based on P-wave Recognition and RR Interval Variability" (VR Zurro, AL Stelle, and J Nadal, Computers in Cardiology 1995, as cited by Applicant and hereinafter referred to as "Zurro").
+
−
|Claims 3-5,27, and 38 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being obvious over Bock.
+
−
|Claims 24 and 34-45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention.
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''12'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060200071A1
+
−
|102 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1-1 3, 15-23, and 25-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Gore et al. (US 2004101 47034).
+
−
|
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''13'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060203963A1
+
−
|102 and 103 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims I , 2,4, 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by Becker et al. (US Patent 6,904,161 BI).
+
−
|Claims 3, 6-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Becker et al (US Patent 6,904,161 B1) in view of Lee (US Patent 4,838,75).
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''14'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060206169A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''15'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060212097A1
+
−
|102 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Vock et al (2003/0163287 A1)
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''16'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060216333A1
+
−
|103 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1-4, 7, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20-22, 27, 34 and 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hedenstrom et al. (200210058674) and Mitra et al. (W0120021102377) in further view of Gordon et al. (20040014779).
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''17'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060276709A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''18'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060276856A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''19'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060281990A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''20'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20060281980A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''21'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070027459A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''22'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070027487A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''23'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070032734A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''24'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070032852A1
+
−
|102 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1 and 3 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (b) as being anticipated by White et al USPN 5,782,904.
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''25'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070038051A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''26'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070034215A1
+
−
|101 rejection
+
−
|Claims 1-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 for nonstatutory subject matter. The invention is ineligible because it has not been limited to a substantial practical application and a tangible result. Instructions to transmit data does not result in a practical application and lacks a tangible result. The result has to be a practical application and a tangible result.
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''27'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070060797A1
+
−
|102 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1 - 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Rogers et al. U.S. Patent No. 6,957,107.
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''28'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070066904A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''29'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070067190A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''30'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070073180A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''31'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070073124A1
+
−
|102 and 103 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 27, 28, 29, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Addison et al. (WO 2041075746).
+
−
|Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 41, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51, 52, and 53 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Addison in view of Prochazka et al article (Decomposition And Reconstruction Methods In Biomedical Image De-Noising, Proc. 1 6 th <nowiki>~</nowiki>ienniaIln t. EURASIP Conference BlOSlGNAL 2002, pp. 350-352, 2002)
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''32'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070073352A1
+
−
|102 and 103 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1-3,6-10,25-29 & 31-34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Deno et al. (WO 031020364 A2).
+
−
|Claims 4-5 & 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Deno et<br>al. (WO 031020364) in view of Frank et al. (US 5,265,615 A).
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''33'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070078306A1
+
−
|112 and 102 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1-1 2 and 19-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Saracen et al (7,362,848)
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 11 2, first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement.
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''34'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070078353A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''35'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070078450A1
+
−
|112, 102 and 103 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Deckelbaum (U.S. Pat. No. 4,785,806).
+
−
|Claims 4-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Deckelbaum (U.S. Pat. No. 4,785,806) in view of Alfano et al (U.S. Pat. No. 5,293,872).
+
−
|Claims 3, 7, 8 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement.
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''36'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070078320A1
+
−
|102 and 103 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1, 2, 8-12, 14-21, and 26-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Funderburk (US Patent 2004101 331 64).
+
−
|Claims 3-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Funderburk in view of Polcha (US Patent Application 2005101 97554).
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''37'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070078678A1
+
−
|102 and 103 rejection
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|Claims 1-4, 6-7, 15-1 7, 19-22, 24-25, 34-36, 38, 40 and 45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Z-Kat (WO 20041070580) as cited by applicant.
+
−
|Claims 5, 8-1 2, 18, 23, 26-31, 37, 39 and 41-42 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Z-Kat as applied to claims 1 and 19 above, and further in view of Krause et al. (US Patent No. 6,711,432).
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''38'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070078335A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''39'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070083152A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''40'''</font>
+
−
|align = "center"|US20070088195A1
+
−
|Rejection information not available
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|N/A
+
−
|-
+
−
|}
+
−
== '''Bilski Diagnostic Methods Sample''' ==
+

Latest revision as of 06:32, 5 May 2009

Retrieved from "https://www.dolcera.com/wiki/index.php?title=Bilski_35_USC_§_101_Rejections_Patent_Application_List&oldid=5994"