View source for Office Action Sample 2- 14782783

=='''Application-14/782,783'''==

The following is the Application-[http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&SeAct2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=20160057044.PGNR. 14/782,783] (filed Oct 6, 2015) for which Non-final Office action has been issued. In this Application, technology for reducing buffer overflow at a Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Serving Gateway (S-GW) is described. <br>

'''Title:''' Reduction of Buffer Overflow<br />
'''Summary/Novelty of the invention:'''''A buffer overflow message may be received, at an evolved node B (eNB) from the S-GW, indicating potential overflow of downlink information at an S-GW buffer. The downlink information may be stored at the S-GW buffer until a plurality of user equipments (UEs) awake from a low power mode during a discontinuous reception (DRX) sleep cycle. One or more UEs may be selected from the plurality of UEs according to predefined criteria, wherein the one or more UEs are in a connected mode. The DRX configurations of the one or more UEs may be modified in order to reduce the downlink information that is stored at the S-GW buffer, thereby reducing the potential for overflow at the S-GW buffer.''
* '''[[Media:Application_14782783.pdf|Application_14/782,783 PDF Document]]'''

=='''Non-final Office Action'''==

The following is the Non-final Office action issued by the Examiner- '''Jason A. Harley''' (Art Unit 2468). The Office Action was issued on Dec 15, 2016.The Office Action contains 101 and 103 rejection.
* '''[[Media:Office Action_14782783.pdf|Non-final Office Action_14/782,783]]'''

=='''References cited in rejection'''==

The below listed files are the three cited references in the Non-final Office Action 14/782,783.
* '''[[Media:Primary Reference_Hsiao-20130223309.pdf|Primary Reference_Hsiao-20130223309]]'''
* '''[[Media:Secondary Reference1_Maeda-20090180414.pdf|Secondary Reference1_Maeda-20090180414]]'''
* '''[[Media:Secondary Reference2_Donthi-20140161007.pdf|Secondary Reference2_Donthi-20140161007]]'''


='''PHASE 1:'''=
=='''Claim vs Reference chart'''==

The following Claim vs Reference chart lists out claim and reference wise rejection. This chart provides birds eye-view of the claims in the Application and the rejections given by Examiner and the corresponding references cited against the claims.
* '''[[Media:Claim Vs Reference Chart_14782783.docx|Claim Vs Reference Chart_14/782,783]]'''
[[File:Screen Shot 2017-03-06 at 2.51.48 pm.png|framed|center|Claim Vs Reference chart]]

=='''Examiner Analytics'''==

The Examiner Analytics chart gives the overall analytics for a particular examiner such as Examiner Allowance rate for RCE, Appeals and Examiner Interviews.
* '''[[Media:Examiner Analytics.docx|Examiner Analytics]]'''
[[File:Screen Shot 2017-03-06 at 2.54.01 pm.png|thumnail|center|Examiner Statistics]]

=='''Prosecution Data Sheet'''== 

The below Prosecution Data Sheet (PDS) is a brief of the proposed amendment/argument. 
# Provides the extension dates after the statutory period and the corresponding fees applicable for each extension
# Provides reference validation check (whether the reference cited by examiner is valid)
# Provides proposed response to each Rejection/Objection and other strategies to claim the white spaces in the Application.
# Gives recommendations based on Examiner statistics
* '''[[Media:Prosecution Data Sheet_14782783.docx|Prosecution Data Sheet_14/782,783]]'''
[[File:Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 6.29.35 pm.png|framed|center|Prosecution Data Sheet]]

='''PHASE 2:'''=
=='''Complete Office Action Response'''==

The following Office action response is the complete draft which contains all the response to obviate/rebut the rejection used by the Examiner against the Application.
* '''[[Media:Office Action Response_14782783.docx|Complete Office Action Response_14/782,78314782783]]'''